🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

European Movement

In Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". A law could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to approve a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," stated one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a influential peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, legislation is primarily occurring at the local level amid national inaction.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various politicians to mimic this path, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, further states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies take a more measured position. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers show that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.